Coastlink members and delegates call for greater
collaboration and cooperation
On 3-4 September, Coastlink held its fourth annual
conference in Gothenburg, Sweden. Amongst the subjects discussed by speakers
and delegates, who represented all aspects of the maritime transport community
including shippers, forwarders, ports and ocean, shortsea and intermodal
carriers, were:
- the rising prices and changing regulations
pertaining to bunker fuels, which threaten the competitive position of shortsea
shipping;
- the need for shippers, ports and transport
operators to create an open environment for dialogue between all parties in
order to find better, more cost effective and more environmentally-friendly
transport solutions.
Following a series of workshops, delegates concluded
that while the rising cost of bunker fuels did pose a threat to shortsea
shipping, especially in Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA), currently the
Baltic, North Sea and English Channel sectors, it also presented opportunities
that might actually outweigh the threats.
In particular, it was noted that the rising cost of
fuel was impacting even more strongly on road transport operators and that
these companies also faced rising taxation levels and labour costs. Road
pricing measures, notably the German Maut system; stricter enforcement of the
European Working Time Directive, including the requirement to use digital
tachographs; and the increasing shortage of longhaul truck drivers will
increase the tonne/mile cost of road haulage and encourage shippers to seek new
ways of moving their goods.
The much vaunted trend towards developing 'sustainable
supply chains' was also on the agenda with delegates seeking to establish
whether there was real substance behind the PR hype. Those of a more cynical
nature were doubtful, noting that despite their companies' public commitments
to reducing carbon footprints, few shipping managers - and those to whom they
report - are prepared to pay even one cent extra for greener transport
solutions.
On a positive note, it seems that some shippers are
perhaps more willing than before to consider new ideas such as shortsea or
intermodal transport. However, they are insistent that such alternatives must
tick all the boxes including price, flexibility and reliability. Several
shippers told of bad experiences when trying rail-based solutions and wanted to
be sure that shortsea and intermodal could deliver a much higher standard of
service.
Transport operators and shippers exchanged views
about who exactly was supposed to develop these new ideas. The former claimed
that it was usually impossible to present alternative ideas to shippers as
tenders too often were precisely drawn up, leaving no room for discussion, with
the outcome solely determined on price.
All agreed that greater colIaboration involving all
parties was desirable. If shippers want frequency, reliability and low cost,
then they should be prepared to sit in the same room as other shippers,
including their competitors, to identify how volumes can be concentrated onto
specific routes, so enabling frequent sailings to be provided on a commercial
basis. Likewise, carriers need to collaborate with each other too if the
thinner routes are to become viable transport arteries.
As the conference drew towards its conclusion, one
speaker voiced exasperation with the progress being made towards finding
solutions, noting that so many conferences and seminars go over the same ground
year after year but nothing seems to advance. He challenged Coastlink to make
things happen by bringing together a select number of shippers, ports and
transport service in one room to develop new strategies that could be presented
to delegates at the next Coastlink conference in Spring 2009.
Coastlink has taken up this challenge but recognises
that one of the biggest difficulties that will confront it is the regulatory
authorities' attitude to such collaboration. Coastlink's Chairman, David
Cheslin, explains:
"We will need to find a way of bringing the right
people into one room without contravening existing anti-competition law. It's
not just a matter of enabling service providers to convene together; we know
that many large shippers, be they manufacturers or retailers, are wary of
discussing their shipping requirements in the presence of their competitors for
fear of reprisals from the competition authorities.
"This will require the cooperation of the relevant EU
departments if we are to deliver what governments say they want, namely more
sustainable forms of transport. Brussels will have to be our first port of
call."
-ends-
|